COURT ALLOWS POLICE OFFICER LAWSUIT TO PROCEED AFTER RULING THAT CITY OF NEW YORK DID NOT PROVIDE THE OFFICER WITH A CRASHWORTHY VEHICLE

In a case with far reaching implications, a Bronx Supreme Court Justice ruled in favor of a New York City Police Officer who was seriously injured when his knee struck the unpadded computer bracket after his RMP was rear-ended by a civilian vehicle. The Officer required knee surgeries and was awarded a ¾ line-of-duty disability pension. DCD, on behalf of the Officer, sued the City of New York pursuant to GML §205-e claiming the unpadded computer bracket created a dangerous condition and made the RMP not crashworthy. DCD argued that GML §205-e required the City of New York to be responsible for MOS injuries resulting from being provided “faulty equipment”. In a 22 page decision, the Court ruled in favor of the Officer and concluded the City of New York is responsible in providing members of the service with functional equipment and would remain liable for an Officer’s injury as a result of being provided with faulty equipment. The case remains on the trial calendar.

Disclaimer:
* no attorney-client relationship is established by contacting the firm * no confidential information should be sent via the internet * no legal advice is given on this site * past results do not guarantee future results * the reader should consult with an attorney about their specific needs

police officer right to sue | police officer lawsuit | police officer line of duty injury | injured in the line of duty line of duty accident | police officer lawyers | police officer legal rights when injured | line of duty injury

Copyright 2024. Decolator, Cohen & DiPrisco
All Rights Reserved.